
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.2 by Marek Hlavac, Harvard University. E-mail: hlavac at fas.harvard.edu
% Date and time: Wed, Sep 18, 2019 - 07:46:14
\begin{table}[!htbp] \centering 
  \caption{Action Index, NGO Pooled Results, Randomization Inference} 
  \label{tab:action:ngo:ri} 
\begin{threeparttable}
\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{5pt}}lcc} 
\\[-1.8ex]\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\\[-1.8ex] & Uganda & Ghana \\ 
 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{NGO Treatment, Non-NGO Control} \\ 
\\[-1.8ex] & (1) & (2)\\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
 Action Index (NMWI) & 0.036$^{*}$ & 0.011 \\ 
  & (0.058) & (0.538) \\ 
  Create Agency & 0.049 & 0.009 \\ 
  & (0.166) & (0.783) \\ 
  Willing to Send SMS & $-$0.025 & 0.006 \\ 
  & (0.468) & (0.822) \\ 
  Sent SMS & $-$0.037 & $-$0.009 \\ 
  & (0.257) & (0.868) \\ 
  Donated (Binary) & 0.079$^{**}$ & $-$0.072$^{**}$ \\ 
  & (0.022) & (0.034) \\ 
  Taxes Willing to Commit (Binary) & 0.049 & 0.009 \\ 
  & (0.184) & (0.813) \\ 
  Signed Petition (Any) & 0.026 & 0.033 \\ 
  & (0.433) & (0.322) \\ 
  Pr(Contact Village Elder) & 0.081$^{**}$ & 0.044 \\ 
  & (0.014) & (0.203) \\ 
  Pr(Contact Local Official) & 0.080$^{**}$ & 0.027 \\ 
  & (0.024) & (0.405) \\ 
  Pr(Contact MP) & 0.016 & 0.051 \\ 
  & (0.644) & (0.122) \\ 
 \hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\multicolumn{3}{l}{$^{*}$p $<$ .1; $^{**}$p $<$ .05; $^{***}$p $<$ .01} \\ 
\end{tabular} 
\begin{tablenotes}
\footnotesize
\item \textit{Notes:} Estimates are based on randomization inference with two-tailed p-values in parentheses. Column 1 reports the Ugandan results while Column 2 reports the Ghanaian estimates.
\end{tablenotes}
\end{threeparttable}
\end{table} 
