
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.2 by Marek Hlavac, Harvard University. E-mail: hlavac at fas.harvard.edu
% Date and time: Wed, Sep 18, 2019 - 07:46:01
\begin{table}[!htbp] \centering 
  \caption{Misappropriation Index, NGO Pooled Results (MI, Manipulation Check)} 
  \label{tab:impbenefitngo} 
\begin{threeparttable}
\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{5pt}}lcc} 
\\[-1.8ex]\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\\[-1.8ex] & Uganda & Ghana \\ 
 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{NGO Treatment, Non-NGO Control} \\ 
\\[-1.8ex] & (1) & (2)\\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
 Misappropriation Index (NMWI) & $-$0.095$^{***}$ & $-$0.005 \\ 
  & (0.027) & (0.023) \\ 
  Misappropriation Index (PCA) & $-$0.112$^{**}$ & $-$0.052 \\ 
  & (0.046) & (0.041) \\ 
  Pr(Used for Clientelism) & $-$0.142$^{***}$ & $-$0.039 \\ 
  & (0.047) & (0.042) \\ 
  Pr(Spending Hidden) & $-$0.052 & $-$0.025 \\ 
  & (0.045) & (0.039) \\ 
  Pr(MP Observes Spending) & $-$0.091$^{*}$ & 0.048 \\ 
  & (0.048) & (0.040) \\ 
 \hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\multicolumn{3}{l}{$^{*}$p $<$ .1; $^{**}$p $<$ .05; $^{***}$p $<$ .01} \\ 
\end{tabular} 
\begin{tablenotes}
\footnotesize
\item \textit{Notes:} Estimates are based on Generalized Least Squares with enumerator fixed effects. Column 1 reports the Ugandan results while Column 2 reports the Ghanaian estimates. Standard errors in parentheses.
\end{tablenotes}
\end{threeparttable}
\end{table} 
