
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.2 by Marek Hlavac, Harvard University. E-mail: hlavac at fas.harvard.edu
% Date and time: Wed, Sep 18, 2019 - 07:46:18
\begin{table}[!htbp] \centering 
  \caption{Influence Index - NGO Treatment, non-NGO Control, Randomization Inference} 
  \label{tab:mp:influence:ngo:ri} 
\begin{threeparttable}
\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{5pt}}lcc} 
\\[-1.8ex]\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\\[-1.8ex] & Uganda & Ghana \\ 
\\[-1.8ex] & (1) & (2)\\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
 Influence Index (NMWI) & 0.017 & $-$0.083$^{***}$ \\ 
  & (0.722) & (0.002) \\ 
  Important to Track Funds & 0.008 & 0.017 \\ 
  & (1.000) & (0.778) \\ 
  Bring Projects to District & 0.036 & $-$0.112$^{***}$ \\ 
  & (0.542) & (0.000) \\ 
  Influence Funds & 0.004 & $-$0.084 \\ 
  & (1.000) & (0.167) \\ 
  Observe Spending & 0.027 & $-$0.184$^{***}$ \\ 
  & (0.647) & (0.000) \\ 
 \hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\multicolumn{3}{l}{$^{*}$p $<$ .1; $^{**}$p $<$ .05; $^{***}$p $<$ .01} \\ 
\end{tabular} 
\begin{tablenotes}
\footnotesize
\item \textit{Notes:} Estimates are based on randomization inference with two-tailed p-values in parentheses. Column 1 reports the Ugandan results while Column 2 reports the Ghanaian estimates.
\end{tablenotes}
\end{threeparttable}
\end{table} 
