
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.2 by Marek Hlavac, Harvard University. E-mail: hlavac at fas.harvard.edu
% Date and time: Wed, Sep 18, 2019 - 07:46:00
\begin{table}[!htbp] \centering 
  \caption{Benefit Index, NGO Pooled Results (Unimputed, Full Sample)} 
  \label{tab:unimpbenefitngofull} 
\begin{threeparttable}
\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{5pt}}lcc} 
\\[-1.8ex]\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\\[-1.8ex] & Uganda & Ghana \\ 
 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{NGO Treat, Non-NGO Ctr} \\ 
\\[-1.8ex] & (1) & (2)\\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
 Benefit Index (NMWI) & 0.026 & 0.047$^{**}$ \\ 
  & (0.024) & (0.022) \\ 
  Benefit Index (PCA) & 0.034 & 0.097$^{***}$ \\ 
  & (0.039) & (0.035) \\ 
  Funds Benefit Family & 0.046 & 0.084$^{**}$ \\ 
  & (0.038) & (0.035) \\ 
  Funds Benefit Community & 0.019 & 0.048 \\ 
  & (0.038) & (0.034) \\ 
  Funds Benefit Ordinary People & $-$0.005 & 0.109$^{***}$ \\ 
  & (0.039) & (0.036) \\ 
  Funds Split Equally & 0.041 & $-$0.039 \\ 
  & (0.039) & (0.037) \\ 
 \hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\multicolumn{3}{l}{$^{*}$p $<$ .1; $^{**}$p $<$ .05; $^{***}$p $<$ .01} \\ 
\end{tabular} 
\begin{tablenotes}
\footnotesize
\item \textit{Notes:} Estimates are based on Generalized Least Squares with enumerator fixed effects. Column 1 reports the Ugandan results while Column 2 reports the Ghanaian estimates. Standard errors in parentheses.
\end{tablenotes}
\end{threeparttable}
\end{table} 
