
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.2 by Marek Hlavac, Harvard University. E-mail: hlavac at fas.harvard.edu
% Date and time: Wed, Sep 18, 2019 - 07:46:14
\begin{table}[!htbp] \centering 
  \caption{Benefit Index, NGO Pooled Results, Randomization Inference} 
  \label{tab:benefit:ngo:ri} 
\begin{threeparttable}
\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{5pt}}lcc} 
\\[-1.8ex]\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\\[-1.8ex] & Uganda & Ghana \\ 
 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{NGO Treatment, Non-NGO Control} \\ 
\\[-1.8ex] & (1) & (2)\\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
 Benefit Index (NMWI) & 0.025 & 0.046$^{**}$ \\ 
  & (0.282) & (0.033) \\ 
  Funds Benefit Family & 0.055 & 0.084$^{**}$ \\ 
  & (0.141) & (0.015) \\ 
  Funds Benefit Community & 0.021 & 0.049 \\ 
  & (0.570) & (0.165) \\ 
  Funds Benefit Ordinary People & $-$0.016 & 0.106$^{***}$ \\ 
  & (0.668) & (0.002) \\ 
  Funds Split Equally & 0.040 & $-$0.039 \\ 
  & (0.250) & (0.267) \\ 
 \hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\multicolumn{3}{l}{$^{*}$p $<$ .1; $^{**}$p $<$ .05; $^{***}$p $<$ .01} \\ 
\end{tabular} 
\begin{tablenotes}
\footnotesize
\item \textit{Notes:} Estimates are based on randomization inference with two-tailed p-values in parentheses. Column 1 reports the Ugandan results while Column 2 reports the Ghanaian estimates.
\end{tablenotes}
\end{threeparttable}
\end{table} 
