
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.2 by Marek Hlavac, Harvard University. E-mail: hlavac at fas.harvard.edu
% Date and time: Wed, Sep 18, 2019 - 07:46:01
\begin{table}[!htbp] \centering 
  \caption{Benefit Index, NGO Pooled Resluts (MI, Manipulation Check)} 
  \label{tab:unimpbenefitngo} 
\begin{threeparttable}
\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{5pt}}lcc} 
\\[-1.8ex]\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\\[-1.8ex] & Uganda & Ghana \\ 
 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{NGO Treatment, Non-NGO Control} \\ 
\\[-1.8ex] & (1) & (2)\\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
 Benefit Index (NMWI) & 0.044 & 0.044$^{*}$ \\ 
  & (0.029) & (0.026) \\ 
  Benefit Index (PCA) & 0.059 & 0.088$^{**}$ \\ 
  & (0.045) & (0.039) \\ 
  Funds Benefit Family & 0.061 & 0.079$^{*}$ \\ 
  & (0.047) & (0.041) \\ 
  Funds Benefit Community & 0.024 & 0.033 \\ 
  & (0.045) & (0.040) \\ 
  Funds Benefit Ordinary People & 0.039 & 0.123$^{***}$ \\ 
  & (0.046) & (0.042) \\ 
  Funds Split Equally & 0.051 & $-$0.060 \\ 
  & (0.048) & (0.044) \\ 
 \hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\multicolumn{3}{l}{$^{*}$p $<$ .1; $^{**}$p $<$ .05; $^{***}$p $<$ .01} \\ 
\end{tabular} 
\begin{tablenotes}
\footnotesize
\item \textit{Notes:} Estimates are based on Generalized Least Squares with enumerator fixed effects. Column 1 reports the Ugandan results while Column 2 reports the Ghanaian estimates. Standard errors in parentheses.
\end{tablenotes}
\end{threeparttable}
\end{table} 
