
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.2 by Marek Hlavac, Harvard University. E-mail: hlavac at fas.harvard.edu
% Date and time: Wed, Sep 18, 2019 - 07:46:17
\begin{table}[!htbp] \centering 
  \caption{Ghana MPs: Benefit Index, Tax Treatment-Oil Control, Het. Effects Results} 
  \label{tab:gh:mp:benefit:taxoil:het} 
\begin{threeparttable}
\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{5pt}}lccc} 
\\[-1.8ex]\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\\[-1.8ex] & Poor Services & High Corruption & Ruling Party \\ 
\\[-1.8ex] & (1) & (2) & (3)\\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
 Benefit Index (NMWI) & 0.035 & 0.235$^{**}$ & $-$0.040 \\ 
  & (0.098) & (0.098) & (0.088) \\ 
  Funds benefit family & 0.197 & 0.303 & $-$0.096 \\ 
  & (0.203) & (0.206) & (0.181) \\ 
  Funds benefit community & 0.006 & 0.174 & $-$0.105 \\ 
  & (0.130) & (0.132) & (0.114) \\ 
  Funds benefit economy & $-$0.048 & 0.098 & 0.035 \\ 
  & (0.082) & (0.085) & (0.075) \\ 
 \hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\multicolumn{4}{l}{$^{*}$p $<$ .1; $^{**}$p $<$ .05; $^{***}$p $<$ .01} \\ 
\end{tabular} 
\begin{tablenotes}
\footnotesize
\item \textit{Notes:} Estimates are based on Generalized Least Squares with enumerator fixed effects. Standard errors in parentheses. Reported estimates are interaction effects that test whether the effect of the treatment varies across potential moderators, including whether the respondent thought there was a poor level of public services in their district (Poor Services), reported high levels of corruption by politicians (Corrupt), and member of the ruling party.
\end{tablenotes}
\end{threeparttable}
\end{table} 
