@article{83396,
  author = {Stephen Chaudoin and Helen V. Milner and Dustin Tingley},
  title = {A Liberal International American Foreign Policy? Maybe Down but Not Out},
  abstract = { <p>An ongoing debate among prominent scholars of international relations concerns the future direction of American foreign policy. In particular, scholars, pundits, and commentators wonder whether the United States will continue to pursue a liberal internationalist stance. At its core, liberal internationalism entails international engagement, not isolationism. And despite the {\textquoteleft}liberal{\textquoteright} terminology, it is not a policy skewed towards Democrats and political liberals and away from Republicans and political conservatives. Instead the liberal component of internationalism embodies many bi-partisan principles: support for freedom, democracy, human rights, a free press, as well as an open world economy for the movement of goods, services, people, and ideas. Not surprisingly, an amazing amount of ink has been spilled on what the election of Donald Trump as President means for the trajectory of U.S. foreign policy and a possible break from liberal internationalism.</p> },
  year = {2017},
  journal = {H-Diplo/ISSF Policy Roundtable},
  volume = {1},
  month = {03/2017},
  url = {https://issforum.org/roundtables/policy/1-6-liberal-internationalism$\#$Essay_by_Stephen_Chaudoin_University_of_Illinois_Helen_V_Milner_Princeton_University_Dustin_Tingley_Harvard_University},
  language = {eng},
}